Author: Martez E. Mott, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock
main argument
Accessibility of touch screens is hindered by implicitly ability-assumptions. Ability-based design can accommodate for a wider range of users.
findings
- User behavior
- Touch-down and Touch-up distances far from target center
- Accidental impact before they were prepared to touch
- Accidental lift-off
- Used the screen for support by sliding
- Previous recommended target sizes not enough to accommodate
- Current state
- Too much emphasis on first and last contact points
- Assumption that user can use fully extended finger
conclusion
Entire touch process must be considered — all touch events. Presumptions made in touch screens:
- That users can interact with a single fully extended finger
- That users possess the fine motor-control skills to land and lift within the bounds of a target
design
- Analyze user touch process and extract most relevant data
- Match data to training samples (templates)
- Resolve the user’s intended (x, y) touch point
- Calculations based on shape and movement stability → indicative pose → template matcher
subjects and sites
- 10 people with motor impairments
- Paid $30 for one hour
terms and themes
- Ability-based design