Author: Martez E. Mott, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock

main argument

Accessibility of touch screens is hindered by implicitly ability-assumptions. Ability-based design can accommodate for a wider range of users.

findings

  • User behavior
    1. Touch-down and Touch-up distances far from target center
    2. Accidental impact before they were prepared to touch
    3. Accidental lift-off
    4. Used the screen for support by sliding
    5. Previous recommended target sizes not enough to accommodate
  • Current state
    1. Too much emphasis on first and last contact points
    2. Assumption that user can use fully extended finger

conclusion

Entire touch process must be considered — all touch events. Presumptions made in touch screens:

  • That users can interact with a single fully extended finger
  • That users possess the fine motor-control skills to land and lift within the bounds of a target

design

  1. Analyze user touch process and extract most relevant data
  2. Match data to training samples (templates)
  3. Resolve the user’s intended (x, y) touch point
  • Calculations based on shape and movement stability → indicative pose → template matcher

subjects and sites

  • 10 people with motor impairments
  • Paid $30 for one hour

terms and themes

  • Ability-based design